Kash Patel and Pam Bondi Present New Evidence Related to the ‘Clinton Corruption Files’

Advertisement

Disclaimer: The article may include the author's opinions.

Advertisement

Newly submitted evidence to Congress has reignited scrutiny over the Clinton Foundation and its alleged misuse of foreign donations for political and personal gain. According to official reports, the documents—delivered by U.S. Attorney General Pam Bondi and FBI Director Kash Patel—outline a pattern of foreign and domestic interests channeling money to the foundation while seeking influence with the Clintons during key periods of their political careers. The new materials were transmitted to the Senate Judiciary Committee in recent days, as confirmed by officials familiar with the matter. These documents reportedly include communications, financial records, and internal memos suggesting that both Hillary and Bill Clinton benefited from donations tied to individuals and corporations hoping to gain access or favor, particularly during Hillary Clinton’s tenure as Secretary of State.

Evidence within the cache is said to indicate that some foreign governments and a U.S. defense contractor made substantial contributions to the Clinton Foundation at the same time they were seeking decisions from the State Department. According to congressional sources, whistleblowers had previously identified this material as part of a larger corruption probe that was allegedly suppressed by senior officials within the Obama-era Department of Justice.

Those whistleblowers—financial analysts Lawrence Doyle and John Moynihan—had provided the IRS with evidence in 2019 suggesting that the Clinton Foundation operated more as a profit-driven enterprise than a registered charity. However, internal IRS memos revealed that the agency abruptly halted its review, instructing investigators to stand down on all Clinton Foundation matters.

According to one of those memos, agents were informed that they can’t talk about the CF, effectively silencing those who had uncovered irregularities in the foundation’s financial structure. It was reported that the whistleblowers were cut off entirely from further communication with federal investigators, raising concerns about intentional obstruction.

Doyle and Moynihan’s findings suggested that the foundation was functioning “like a global fund,” funneling money and pharmaceuticals under the guise of humanitarian projects but retaining as much as 60 percent of its revenue for “administrative fees”, a figure far above the industry standard of 10–15 percent.

In their analysis, the two experts concluded that the Clinton Foundation operated “not as a charitable organization per se, but as a closely held family partnership,” designed primarily to advance the personal and political interests of its principals rather than any philanthropic mission.

The new tranche of documents provided by Bondi and Patel reportedly demonstrates that evidence of this nature was deliberately withheld from the 2015 investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office in Little Rock, Arkansas. According to sources familiar with the case, field-level FBI agents and Department of Justice prosecutors had attempted to “follow the money,” but their efforts were blocked before reaching senior decision-makers.

One official briefed on the materials stated that the documents clearly show “an effort to obstruct legitimate inquiries into the Foundation by preventing real investigation at the operational level.” Analysts have noted that the timing of these revelations—coming under a Trump administration that has prioritized transparency and accountability—could renew calls for a formal criminal inquiry into what has long been described by critics as one of the largest “pay-to-play” operations in modern American politics.

The pattern of foreign donations to the Clinton Foundation during Hillary Clinton’s service as Secretary of State continues to raise fundamental questions about how much influence was effectively for sale during the Obama years, and why earlier investigations were quietly shelved before the full truth could be uncovered.

With Congress now in possession of these new documents, pressure is expected to grow for full disclosure and accountability. Conservatives argue that the Clinton Foundation saga underscores the double standard that has protected powerful Democrats from the same legal scrutiny routinely directed toward President Trump and his allies.

Share the article to spread the truth