CNN Legal Analyst Predicts Trump Sentencing in 'Hush Money' Case

Subscribe for free to eliminate ads

Disclaimer: The article may include the author's opinions.

CNN senior legal analyst Elie Honig has cast doubt on the likelihood of President-elect Donald Trump ever facing sentencing in the ongoing New York case against him. This comes after Judge Juan Merchan indefinitely postponed Trump’s sentencing, initially set for Tuesday, granting time for further legal motions and deliberations.

Judge Merchan’s decision to delay the proceedings allows Trump’s legal team until December 2 to file a motion for dismissal, with prosecutors required to respond by December 9. This indefinite pause has led Honig to predict that the case may never reach sentencing, citing Trump’s status as president-elect and the legal complexities surrounding immunity for sitting presidents.

It was explained on CNN by Honig that Trump was unlikely to be sentenced before assuming office or during his presidency. Further speculation was offered that the case could potentially disappear entirely, aligning with arguments presented by Trump’s defense attorneys.

Trump’s lawyers argue that the case should be dismissed to ensure an orderly transition of executive power after his 2024 election victory. The defense emphasizes that prosecuting Trump as president-elect interferes with constitutional protections for his executive role.

Conversely, Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg has suggested delaying sentencing until Trump’s presidency concludes in 2029. However, legal analysts like Honig and MSNBC’s Kristy Greenberg see this as impractical and unlikely, with Greenberg dismissing any legal precedent for overturning a jury’s verdict due to Trump’s presidential status.

Steven Cheung, Trump’s Communications Director, hailed the indefinite postponement as a significant victory, framing it as evidence of Trump overcoming what his team has long referred to as witch hunt cases. Cheung stated that President Trump’s landslide victory proves the American People’s mandate to return him to office and end these sham legal attacks.

Despite the celebratory tone from Trump’s camp, Judge Merchan’s decision to permit arguments for overturning the conviction leaves the door open for further legal wrangling. Trump’s lawyers argue that the conviction hinders his ability to serve effectively as president, likening his immunity as president-elect to that of a sitting president.

The outcome of these proceedings could set a significant precedent for how legal cases against high-ranking political figures are handled, particularly during transitions of power. The case remains in limbo, with no sentencing date in sight and continued debate over the balance between legal accountability and executive privilege.